![]() ![]() My image processing has definitely improved in the past 6 weeks as I have made a concerted effort to get better at it. I’m also sometimes only doing a single pass of high pass filter sharpening, at 0.2px, rather than 2 passes. I’m now finding that sometimes, I’m not adding contrast, or using opacity to turn the contrast down. I use a piece of software called “PixInsight” and it’s night and day better than Photoshop in UI imh9o not even close, but it’s a dedicated application for processing astrophotography images. I hate the way Photoshop does masks, it’s horrible. At least I’m using masks now, even if it’s not very good, or very efficient lol. I’ve tried the quick selection tool, but personally find it horrible to use. I’ve been sometimes using Topaz at the end of my workflow, and I’m now learning about masks, so sometimes I’m painting out the effects of Topaz on the bird where I feel that it’s way over sharpened the birds feather detail. I guess if you have a newer camera with much better high ISO performance than my 60D, ymmv.ĭo that, it is the only way to fine tune for your work flow. As a comparison, Topaz DeNoise took 17 seconds and DxO PhotoLab took 28 seconds for the same file. I have found DXO and Topaz to work well together and compliment each other very well. On my 2018 MacBook Pro with Radeon 570 graphics, NoNoise processed the above 20 Megapixel file in less than two seconds. I do a minimal amount of sharpening in Lightroom too (+20). Interesting on the halos - I have noticed some halos on my images, and I do use the lens correction enable profile corrections option in Lightroom. I would make a decision which program to use for noise reduction on a given file, not both. If I used noise reduction in DXO PureRAW I would not use Topaz Denoise. It is generally used to get the best RAW file (DNG here) before final edits in a photo editor like PS or Affinity Photo. If you use optical corrections, noise reduction or sharpening in DXO PureRAW, best to avoid adding more in the photo editor, or you will get ugly halos from over sharpening and too much noise reduction. And you have to define the source with “Source: ” (working link).It does a very good job of RAW conversion to DNG, optical corrections, noise reduction and sharpening. You cannot copy more than 20 words from any of our posts. Adobe have added a machine learning powered denoise algorithm to Lightroomand Photoshop(via camera raw). Here is the definition of the word “rumor” according to Merriam Webster dictionary:Įtymology: Middle English rumour, from Anglo-French, from Latin rumor clamor, gossip akin to Old English rēon to lament, Sanskrit rauti he roarsġ: talk or opinion widely disseminated with no discernible sourceĢ: a statement or report current without known authority for its truthģ archaic : talk or report of a notable person or eventĬontent Copyright If you want to use any image from this website you have to ask for permission. All trademarks and brands belong to their respective owners. Please visit their official websites by typing the specific brand name and adding. DxO DeepPRIME is exceptional, whereas Topaz generates all kinds of artifacts (visible when you zoom in 200 and more). Clever supply launched the new Camera Sling on Kickstarter (click here).ĭisclaimer: SonyAlphaRumors has no affiliation with any of the equipment manufacturers mentioned on this site. Rajan Parrikar wrote: My experience is the opposite.The new Power Junkie 2 is now available on Kickstarter (Click here).The new Korin Anti-Theft bag launched on Kickstarter (Click here).It now comes with two different base plates and a adjustable comfort strap made in five colours. It’s a different way to carry your camera and an update to their previous CP version. The new Spinn CP is now available on Kickstarter (Click here). ![]() Reminder: Topaz Gigapixel is available as standalone or within the now discounted new Photo Ai 2.1 version ($40 off now til Feb 17). While there’s a more noticeable difference to be found in upsampling from higher-res source photos, in the lower-res shots where it’s potentially most useful, Super Resolution proved to be basically indistinguishable from the Preserve Details 2.0 filter. The big disappointment of the trio was, surprisingly, Adobe. ![]() ![]() And that smoothing can easily be dialed back manually if, like me, you prefer a less-plasticky look. While it’s a bit prone to over-smoothing it generally gives clearly better results than its rivals. Topaz released the new Photo Ai 2.1 version ($40 off now til Feb 17).ĭpreview tested compared the three major upscale software and concluded:įor my money, the clear winner here overall is Topaz Gigapixel AI. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |